Discrimination is legal in NZ, equality is dead.

Read all about how the Court of Appeal prevents Singaporeans from appealing the unfair decision of a High Court judge, that the CPF savings of Singaporeans belong to the NZ Ministry of Social Development (i.e. taxed 100%) while the CPF savings of their ex-Premier, SIR John Key and thousands of Kiwis who worked in Singapore and collected their CPF money are tax-free and belong only to them. If this is not DISCRIMINATION, what do you call it? Singaporeans are lesser beings than their own people?

Criminals have the right of appeal to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, but Singaporeans have to ask permission to appeal the unfair decision of a High Court judge by applying for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal, and denied the right to appeal.

NZ DISCRIMINATES against Singapore nationals

The PM had collected his Singapore CPF Savings TAX-FREE from the Singapore CPF Board.

He is the leader of the country and preached to the UN General Assembly, that “we got to do the right thing” during the Syrian refugee crisis in Europe.

Easy to talk but he does not WALK THE TALK.  Why does he not do the right thing and take charge to correct the DISCRIMINATION against Singapore Citizens who are permanent residents of NZ?

Instead, he supports the DISCRIMINATION against ONE NATIONALITY perpetrated by his Chief Executive  of the  NZ Ministry of Social Development  –  to support is to condone.

Therefore, he is just as guilty of unlawful DISCRIMINATION under the NZ Human Rights Act 1993 as his Chief Executive.

People in high authority should have even higher standards of MORAL Leadership. Instead, he has led the country stray from the path of righteousness and JUSTICE.

NZ Discrimination

Why do the NZ State Counsels file a motion to exclude the name of the NZ Prime Minister in the complaint to the Human Rights Review Tribunal?

The role of a leader of the country is to set the tone of the country i.e. to set a good example.  The NZ human Rights Act 1993 stated DISCRIMINATION is UNLAWFUL, whether it is done DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY.

The fact that the Chief Executive of the NZ Ministry of Social Development discriminates against ONLY Singapore Citizens is fundamentally unlawful.  Singapore Citizens, already DISCRIMINATED by their own government, suffer a 100% TAX in NZ on their CPF SAVINGS refunded MONTHLY by the CPF Board.

The fact that the NZ PM and all their NZ citizens who had worked in Singapore and collected their CPF Savings in FULL and TAX-FREE when they left Singapore, were not affected is proof of DISCRIMINATION against Nationality under their own Human Rights Act 1993.

The fact that Malaysian Permanent Residents in NZ receive their FULL Pension Entitlement, as well as all other nationalities who had worked in Singapore, is also proof of Discrimination against Singapore Citizens who are also NZ Permanent Residents and have paid the high NZ Taxes for more than 10 years.

So Teflon John, as he is known, does not want his name sullied but allows his Chief Executive to have the previously good name of NZ sullied.

Does the Ministry of Justice condone a Chief Executive to practice Discrimination which the NZ Human Rights Act 1993 stated is UNLAWFUL?

Breaking news – PART II

Default Re: Singapore DISCRIMINATES against its own citizens by not returning their CPF savin

Breaking News – Part 2
Well, surprise, surprise (or is it), the NZ govt lawyers filed a motion to remove the NZ PM as the Other Party on the excuse that the PM does not have the power to resolve the CPF matter although he worked in Merrill Lynch Singapore, collected his CPF and was the only western leader of a supposedly democratic country (NZ) to fly ten and a half hours to attend Singapore’s 50th Anniversary. Even the Indonesian President (45 mins flight time away) did not bother to attend SG50 and only sent one of his junior ministers to attend.
WHAT POWERS DOES HE HAVE? Is his job just to entertain on You Tube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LT2k4uR4ho

Is it a COVER-UP? To not embarrass his selfish attitude and character that as he had filled his pockets with his CPF money which the Singapore CPF Board eagerly returns to foreigners but not Singaporeans, so he is not bothered to resolve this DISCRIMINATION?

From – http://e2nz.org/contribute/#comment-222709

 

  1. NZBLAH

November 6, 2015 at 10:36 pm

Another fine example of New Zealands’ corrupt and failing court system…

My husband previously owned property in Auckland which he rented out to what turned out to be a dodgy tenant. It wasn’t long before he stopped paying the rent. My husband is a kind and reasonable man and kept offering this man chance after chance to catch up. Eventually the property got sold and the rental arrears had mounted to 6000 dollars. When seeking help, my husband was told he had to go through mediation with the tenant. Erm, yes, like that would help. Not.

Anyway, to cut a long story short, the tenant was summoned to court and ordered to pay back the outstanding amount in monthly payments, 200 dollars per month, starting last October. Bearing in mind the property got sold a year before that. You can all guess what happened, after one month the payment stopped. My husband got in touch with Civil Enforcement at the Ministry of Justice asking what had happened, after all, an automatic payment had been set up. And here follows the exact content of the email he received in reply: “Automatic payment was from debtor’s account and debtor has access to this account. If the payment has stopped, it is the debtor who has stopped it.” And that was it.

What the hell?! The sheer incompetence and unwillingness of the Ministry of Justice is unbelievable. What makes it even worse, is that the tenant – who is a property developer – has owned 13 companies over the past 10 years which have all gone bust. No less than 6 months after the previous company went into receivership, he set up a new company.

How on earth is this possible? Why is it allowed to happen and why do the bad people go unpunished?
We are disgusted and count our blessings we got out of that arsehole nation.

Reply

December 13, 2015 at 11:03 pm

How very true. My tenant did not pay rent for three months and it took another three months to get the bailiff to evict him. Then he stole my dishwasher and sold it. The police caught him and the court ordered him to pay $500 (when the dishwasher cost $1,200) and he paid $10 per month and only for the first month. When I contacted the court, those idle people told me I have to find out his new address as he had moved out from his mother’s home. Only then could the bailiff serve him a new order to pay the balance $490 @ $10 a month! What the f…..???
I contacted BayCorp, the people who will recover your money for you and charge a high commission, and gave his name to them, Jason Sutherland (P.S. -Dear Ed, you may or may not publish the real name, it is up to you) and BayCorp told me there are 20 others named Jason Sutherland in their bad debtors’ list??????
I gave up.

Reply

 

Tracy

November 27, 2015 at 11:24 am

I just returned to the us after 9 years in NZ and despite the problems the US has, it still offers better opportunity than NZ will ever have. So the deal is I grew up in what is now Silicon Valley. After my wife died I decided to quit the rat race and move to NZ where the promise of better work/life balance a more laid back approach to life and the beauty were a real draw. I found a job in biotech and was made an offer. So the process to migrate began. I should have known from the very start when my case officer screwed up my application that this attitude was endemic in NZ. Bottom line is don’t drink the NZ 100% pure kool-aid. NZ does a great job of marketing, but there is little substance to what is there.

When I arrived it was clear from the beginning that there is a habit of new people going to NZ full of promise, ideas, energy and such. But after a few months of hitting brick walls, people saying “go back where you came from, being robbed and generally finding the cost of living to be much higher than the government sites would have you believe, the blom was already of the rose.

That’s okay, I have lived in many states in the US and in countries, so I am no stranger to adaptation. But what I did find was gross racism, nepotism, an attitude of “we don’t care” and having time off is more important than working. Unfortunately I didn’t learn that until I started a biotech company and couldn’t find talent, and the “talent” I did find was under qualified and not willing to work very hard. On top of that the investors I had, farmers and property developers, were expecting to get returns like they had with farms and housing. To top it of the government gave us a grant, but applied compliance terms that were unprecedented. It is no wonder there is no biotechnology in NZ (Sorry, that’s not true. they consider new forms of grass and breeds of cows and sheep to be biotechnology! What a joke!) All the talent we did find was imported from overseas and the resentment of the locals was palpable.

so now I have acquired the rights to the technology I had in New Zealand and brought it home to the US where the talent, resources and capital are literally falling at my feet! But wait, now my former company is not honoring my license, so what am I to do? Sue? Yeah, right. As others have posted the NZ courts are more like a criminal day-care system. After being burglarized twice, robbed three times and my son being mugged I found little to no solace with the police or courts. So I would rather live in the US where criminals are actually held to account, rather than NZ where crime is merely a way of life.

When I was recently asked what I missed about NZ, it came down to one thing: the scenery and being able to be in the country after a ew minutes drive. I don’t miss the attitudes of (most) Kiwis, I don’t miss the high cost of living, I don’t miss the BS of “clean and green,” I don’t miss the horrible food, and I don’t miss the fact that Air New Zealand has a monopoly on air travel and will cancel you flight at a moments notice and not give a toss. As a business owner there are many other things that after 9 years I won’t miss. Lazy workers, high cost of materials, clueless investors who only want quick returns, difficult working conditions imposed by “partners” the previously mentioned lack of qualified talent, etc, etc.

Oh and to those of you who are thinking of getting an education in NZ, the educational system is also horrible. For example, my daughter, who attended a high school in the US ranked in the top 1% was told she was not qualified to graduate because she didn’t have all the UK and Maori historical BS. This despite scoring very high on her SATs. The solution? An online GED that allowed her to get into a top US University. To top that of, the university my labs are at ofers a “Biotechnoloby” degree they proudly tout as the first “named Biotechnology degree in the world” Yeah? So what, when you idea of biotechnology is brewing beer! The “biotech engineers” I hired had never even seen a bioreactor. The university system is merely a Ponzi scheme by the government to indebt students through student loans for degrees no one gives a toss about because the degrees are useless. This is why most University professors are home grown. All the good Kiwi professors I have worked with are overseas at real universities.

So farewell NZ. Nice to visit, will never live there again.

When you wallow with PIGS, expect to get dirty.

This is a great article –

 

“When You Wallow with the Pigs, Expect to Get Dirty”

Read more: http://www.omniintelligencer.com/Culture-Society/Culture-Society/When-You-Wallow-with-the-Pigs-Expect-to-Get-Dirty#ixzz3nO6MXTyp

Written by Steve Allison |

 

If you grew up in the same house I did, and I’m sure most of you did, you probably heard it like this–”you’re known by the company you keep”.

However, I prefer “when you wallow with the pigs, expect to get dirty!”  This happens to be one of my all-time favorite quotes, cowboy or otherwise.  The wisdom packed in these 10 words is truly amazing!

Unlike dogs or cats, pigs can’t pant to keep themselves cool so they have to wallow in the mud.

When I really think about it,  that seems to be the problem when kids and adults hang around or are influenced by the wrong crowd.

It’s a “coolness” problem.  Our society has glamorized poor behavior, so naturally many people are drawn to it  like a moth to a flame.  It’s the ticket to be COOL!

We tend to blame the media, the movies, music and the like for creating this mess. In reality, it’s not their fault.  That’s right, you heard me.  IT’S NOT THEIR FAULT!  If there were no money made by exploiting  poor or bad behavior, the different media wouldn’t promote it.

Most people know right from wrong and good from bad.  So where does the fault lie?

With the individual.

It’s our choice on whom we choose emulate or call our friends.  This is a choice we should not take lightly.  We should pick our role models as well as our friends wisely.

A few years ago, Charles Barkley, former NBA star proclaimed,  “I’m not a role model”  in a famous Nike commercial.  This proclamation was highly controversial at the time.  Naturally, Nike was pleased since it generated “shock value” creating a word-of-mouth marketing buzz.

Was he right?

Yes and no.

He was right in the fact, we shouldn’t deify celebrities.  We don’t know what their character is like out of the spotlight or what skeletons are in their closets.  We’re often crushed when we find out our icon is human and “falls from grace”.  Do I need to mention Tiger Woods?

Barkley is also wrong.  Many celebrities crave the attention, money and fame their status brings.  With that said, they OWE the public who gives them the fame and fortune they desire, a person who is beyond reproach.

Too much to expect, maybe, but that’s the price paid for the fame.

What about friends?

Same is true with them.  Actually, more so.  The people you choose to be around will impact you whether you believe it or not.

How many times have you said, “I don’t understand it, how did he/she get involved with __________?”  (Drugs, alcohol, abuse, affair etc.) “They come from such a good family.”

For whatever reason it’s easier to pull someone down than to lift them up.  My niece who teaches physics will have to explain this to me someday.

Conversely, the other is true as well.  If you desire to be a better person, find people who have the qualities and values you admire and associate with them.

Develop a value system or code of conduct that YOU WILL LIVE BY.  Living the values of the cowboy is a good place to start.

Life is full of choices. We choose every day who we are and the code we live by.

“When you wallow with the pigs, expect to get dirty.”

Read more: http://www.omniintelligencer.com/Culture-Society/Culture-Society/When-You-Wallow-with-the-Pigs-Expect-to-Get-Dirty#ixzz3nO6YxuBA

Read about more DISCRIMINATION

The REAL NZ – http://e2nz.org/dont-move-zealand/
Immigration NZ’s slogan is “NZ – the right choice” – REALLY? No real jobs, DISCRIMINATION, expensive food, high taxes, ACC fees, high crime figures, mostly unsolved especially burglaries, assaults, rapes, etc.
Their FB page “100% Pure NZ” is the joke of the century, especially when all the cows and sheep poo flow into the rivers for the Watercare Council Company to deliver to the population.

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?220849-Singapore-DISCRIMINATES-against-its-own-citizens-by-not-returning-their-CPF-savings

 

The Human Rights Act 1993

Part 3: Relevant provisions of the Human Rights Act 1993

21 Prohibited grounds of discrimination  –  (g) ethnic or national origins, which includes nationality or citizenship   e.g.

The form that the Chief Executive insisted that Singaporeans send to the Singapore CPF Board will adversely affect only Singapore Citizens, because all other nationalities have been returned their CPF SAVINGS.  Mr John Key has collected his CPF Savings (along with thousands of NZ Citizens and other nationalities) so why is my CPF Savings a PENSION that is deductible from NZ Super?

65 Indirect discrimination

Where any conduct, practice, requirement, or condition that is not apparently in contravention of any provision of this Part has the effect of treating a person or group of persons differently on 1 of the prohibited grounds of discrimination in a situation where such treatment would be unlawful under any provision of this Part other than this section, that conduct, practice, condition, or requirement shall be unlawful under that provision unless the person whose conduct or practice is in issue, or who imposes the condition or requirement, establishes good reason for it.

 66 Victimisation  –  (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to treat or threaten to treat any other peson less favourably than he or she would treat other persons in the same or substantially similar circumstances.

There are dozens of websites and blogs floating around on the www about New Zealand’s discrimination against Singapore nationals, an unlawful act under New Zealand’s own Human Rights Act 1993.

What price does one place on REPUTATION?

As an analogy, a Singapore Citizen (Roy Ngerng, a true story) is pummeled to the ground by the Singapore Prime Minister when he asked for the return of his life-time CPF Savings.  As he is lying on the pavement, with broken legs and broken hands, the Chief Executive of the NZ Ministry of Social Development (MSD) comes along and takes the coins left in the victim’s wallet (deductible NZ Pension).  The NZ PM with his wallet full of his CPF Savings he had collected tax-free from the Singapore CPF Board passes by the poor victim, looks down at him lying on the ground, turns on his heels and walks away.

The MSD, in deducting 100% of CPF Savings is actually taxing a Singapore Citizen 100% as the amount is deducted from his entitlement – while all other nationalities, including New Zealand citizens who had worked in Singapore received their full REFUNDS from the Singapore CPF Board.  How is money from the same CPF account be different for Singaporeans (deductible NZ Pension) while all others, including Mr John Key, are non-taxable savings?

The MSD, in fully participating in Singapore’s DISCRIMINATION, is also GUILTY of DISCRIMINATION, whether DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY.

The MSD in paying the full NZ Pension to New Zealand, Malaysian, Australian, English, Indian and Indonesian citizens who had worked in Singapore and had been REFUNDED their CPF Savings in FULL before they reached 55 years of age is again DISCRIMINATORY.

The MSD in paying the full NZ Pension to former Singapore Citizens who had given up their Singapore Citizenship and NOT to Singapore nationals is again DISCRIMINATORY.

Instead, the exaggerated interpretation that the CPF is a Pension, Benefit or Periodic Allowance similar to that of New Zealand, under Section 70 of the Social Security Act, is a blatant LIE.

Unless the English language is different in NZ, one’s savings (like Kiwisaver) cannot be deemed a pension, benefit, periodic allowance or payment. When one with-draw’s money monthly from one’s savings account (to pay the inflated Rates, electricity and water bills), it would be totally skewed to call those withdrawals payments from the bank.

PEOPLE in HIGH POSITIONS of POWER should have even HIGHER MORAL STANDARDS.

SPSform

Discrimination against Singaporeans by the Singapore and New Zealand governments

A tale of 4 citizens

August 23rd, 2015 |  Author: Contributions

A Tale of 4 citizens

  1. Ah Kow is a Malaysian from Penang. He came to work in Singapore and became a Permanent Resident. After decades of working in Singapore, he COLLECTED his CPF SAVINGS and returned to Penang to retire comfortably in a bungalow with a Mercedes car.
  2. Li Ning is a student from China sponsored by the Singapore government to study in Singapore. She was given a living allowance and free education from Secondary One to University. After graduation, the Singapore government employed her and asked her to be a citizen. She declined, continued working for 5 years and went back to China for a better-paying job (as people who can speak English are valued in China, thanks to sponsorship from Singapore) after collecting her CPF SAVINGS.
  3. John is a New Zealand (Kiwi) citizen. He was employed as an English teacher and got his permanent residency after just three months. He worked for ten years and COLLECTED his CPF SAVINGS and went home to buy a bungalow and a Volvo car.
  4. Krishnan is a Singapore Citizen and worked as a technician until he was retrenched as the boss employed a cheaper foreign talent. Then he became a taxi driver and found he could not renew his taxi licence unless he paid money into his CPF. When he was 55 years old, he found he could not withdraw his CPF SAVINGS. When he reached 65, he found that the CPF Board only refunded him $500 a month of his own money for his living expenses. Then they told him that he has to pay medical insurance premiums from 1st November this year or be thrown into jail.

Which government can treat its own citizens in these immoral, unethical, unlawful and deviant ways? Who allowed them to do these evil acts?

DO YOU STILL WANT TO VOTE PAP?

A nation betrayed

*  Comment appeared in TRE article:  “A Malaysian’s encounter with a Minister Chan“.

 

 

 

A nation betrayed:

August 23, 2015 at 6:00 pm  (Quote)

A tale of another 2 citizens – PART II

  1. Jun Ki is a NZ citizen and came to this island to work as there were not enough jobs there. He was able to get a job within two weeks and worked as a forex trader for a few years, made his fortune, collected his CPF SAVINGS and went home with his CPF money which the CPF Board willingly and eagerly returned to him. When Jun Ki reached 65 years old, he became entitled to a pension from the NZ government. His CPF Savings were NOT deducted from his pension by the NZ government as they were considered SAVINGS. After all, he had collected his CPF SAVINGS years ago, before he reached 65 and the NZ government is no wiser.
  2. Tua Kee is a Singapore citizen. He was retrenched after working for the biggest government bank for 20 years as his salary was considered high and foreign talents were cheap, cheap, cheap. Fake Masters degrees from India were OK as the Singapore Minister said foreign experience was more important. He went to work in NZ otherwise he would have to clean toilets or clean tables in the food courts in Singapore. When he reached 65 years, as a Permanent Resident, he was also entitled to the pension from the NZ government BUT the NZ government deducted the CPF $500 monthly refund from his NZ pension!

Now, how did the CPF SAVINGS of Jun Ki, a NZ citizen turn into a CPF PENSION for a Singapore citizen?  Is NZ such a FAIR and JUST country after all the hype and talk of HUMAN RIGHTS? Did the NZ government imitate the PAP who labelled the CPF as a wonderful PENSION FUND designed by the Singapore government to show the western world Singapore is a FIRST WORLD COUNTRY? – in other words, MONKEY SEE, MONKEY MUST DO?
BECAUSE Singaporeans are easy targets – they are the only people in the world that voted the party of famiLEE and cronies to screw them for 50 years, closing both eyes disregarding WHAT IS RIGHT and WHAT IS WRONG – the IMMORAL PARTY.
So if you wish to work in NZ and receive the NZ Pension, which is the entitlement of all Permanent Residents, Singaporeans MUST give up their citizenship, whereas other nationalities NEED NOT e.g. Malaysians, China citizens and Kiwis are not forced to throw away their passports.
Singapore government does not discriminate against NZ citizens, but the NZ government discriminates against Singapore citizens.

The Singapore PAP government discriminates against its own citizens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZqTK6WBfOc

https://www.facebook.com/900chuawilliam/videos/10203938926908634/?fref=nf

Singapore CPF is NOT a PENSION

In New Zealand, CPF is a pension fund

June 18th, 2015 |  Author: Contributions

If you wish to migrate to New Zealand – DON’T.

New Zealand

When you live and work and pay taxes in NZ for at least 10 years, you will be entitled to receive a pension when you attain 65 years of age.  However, the Chief Executive of the NZ Ministry of Social Development ruled that the CPF is a Pension Fund although it is actually from your contributions and your employer’s contributions. He actually conveniently believed the PAP propaganda that Singapore has an excellent social security pension fund called the CPF!

Would you not think that a person heading a large government department and paid a couple of hundred thousand dollars a year have more common sense, honesty and justice? NZ has a similar CPF fund called a Kiwisaver, also contributed from the employer and employee – BUT, it is voluntary and not compulsory.

This Chief Executive ruled that the Kiwisaver monies are not deductible from the NZ Pension payments but the CPF is so that he could reduce the superannuation budget and score points with the current government whose Prime Minister, Mr John Key, had worked in Merrill Lynch in Singapore in 1995 and collected his CPF monies before he left Singapore for Merrill Lynch London.

Therefore, a Singaporean who has already been cheated ONCE by the PAP government which allowed foreigners to withdraw their CPF except their own citizens (which is contrary to the Human Rights Act i.e. discrimination against nationality) – and now the Singaporean is cheated against another time by this Chief Executive of the NZ Ministry of Social Development, which is also contrary to the Human Rights Act (discrimination against Singaporeans whose life-time of compulsory savings have been hijacked by the PAP).

The Immigration brochures from the NZ Embassy has the slogan to entice qualified immigrants that states, “NZ the right choice”- is it really?

CPF is not a Pension Fund

29 Responses to “In New Zealand, CPF is a pension fund”

Giggling Girl:

June 18, 2015 at 2:17 pm  (Quote)

reminds me of why New Zealand is the only country where Singapore Citizens can apply for a Working Holiday Visa…because their gov’t is daft to actually believe the PAP AGENDA

 

Catch No Ball:

June 18, 2015 at 1:42 pm  (Quote)

Am I the only one here who catch no ball what this writer is trying to say? So what if CPF is considered a Pension Fund by NZ? Does he mean to say that NZ govt is intentionally out to cheat Singaporeans? Or that having CPF reduces any pension that you get from the NZ govt? If he migrated to NZ and only discovered this now, then whose fault you never check before you migrate?

 

June 18, 2015 at 7:33 pm  (Quote)

There are a number of language-challenged people like “Catch No Ball” making low grey-matter comments in this forum.

Malaysians living in NZ collect their EPF at 55 years. Therefore, they collect their full pension. The supposedly corrupt Malaysian govt did not cheat their own citizens of their life-time savings.

WHICH GOVT IS MORE CORRUPT?

Singaporeans have their CPF hijacked from 55 to 65 and then only given out in drips and draps.

Singaporeans collect their CPF in monthly instalments e.g. $500 per month and the NZ govt deducts this amount from the pension as they consider CPF a pension when it is from your own savings. Thus, the NZ govt rubber-stamps the thievery of the Singapore govt and commits theft of $500 by not paying out the full entitlement!

So, Malaysians get the full pension but Singaporeans get the pension MINUS $500 – understand now?
If you still have family in Singapore, why must you give up your red passport, just to collect all your CPF? Malaysians have been coming to NZ many years before Singaporeans came to NZ and yet they still retain their Malaysian passports.

Thus, Singaporeans are discriminated against by nationality which is unlawful under the Human Rights Act.

 

flabbergasted:

June 18, 2015 at 9:22 pm  (Quote)

Let’s worry about what evil we are facing at home.

Let the kiwis worry about themselves!

 

June 19, 2015 at 7:44 am  (Quote)

“I am assuming the “OVERALL PENSION” is a combination of state-funded pension money + Kiwisaver money.”
The Kiwisaver money belongs to the account holder, is not deductible, is paid out in full at 65, and is not part of the state-funded pension – whereas the CPF savings have been ‘kidnapped’by the greedy ‘red dot’so-called, rotting founding father who fooled daft countries (GIGGLING GIRL: “reminds me of why New Zealand is the only country where Singapore Citizens can apply for a Working Holiday Visa…because their gov’t is daft to actually believe the PAP AGENDA”) that the CPF is indeed a wonderful social security pension, as if the money in the CPF came from the state.

 

June 19, 2015 at 5:38 pm  (Quote)

“Let’s worry about what evil we are facing at home.
Let the kiwis worry about themselves!” – from flabbergasted.

Dr Martin Luther King said:”Injustice ANYWHERE is a threat to justice EVERYWHERE.”

 

References :      http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/06/18/in-new-zealand-cpf-is-a-pension-fund/

http://sonofadud.com/2015/06/12/breaking-news-amos-yee-is-the-worlds-youngest-prisoner-of-conscience-to-be-recognised-by-amnesty-international/

 

 

First world CUNTry?:

June 27, 2015 at 3:40 pm  (Quote)

The little red dot has many, many LAWS but no JUSTICE. What a shame to boast about first in everything – first in INJUSTICE too!
The slide into depravity all began with the appointment of the crony banker as Cheap Justice – faster, speedier, better and not so cheap any more to obtain justice. How many innocent local citizens have been incarcerated and hanged until death?
Round and round the courts we go, who is next nobody knows. Keep on voting these real criminals at your own peril – you may be next!

Rating: +5 (from 5 votes)

 

June 29, 2015 at 4:39 pm  (Quote)

Not just are the PAP dipping their filthy, grubby fingers into the Singapore Citizens’ forced CPF savings, the Chief Executive of the New Zealand Ministry of Social Development also wants a portion of the hijacked CPF – making pensioners write to the CPF Board in the form devised by them – ” I resided in Singapore for ___ years and ___ months.
This may entitle me to a Central Provident Fund (CPF) comprehensive social security savings plan old age lump sum or monthly payments. I have been asked by the New Zealand government to check my eligibility.”
THEN THEY WILL DEDUCT (or get CPF to pay directly to NZ, like the British Government is paying directly English pensions to NZ) WHATEVER YOU GET MONTHLY FROM YOUR HIJACKED (by PAP)CPF SAVINGS.
Singaporeans are easy targets as the whole world can see because they allowed the PAP to steal their hard-earned forced savings – MONKEY SEE, MONKEY DO.
If PAP can DO, I can DO TOO!

 

July 3, 2015 at 4:28 pm  (Quote)

In no other country on this planet has a government stolen the savings of the people and the people vote them in for five decades. Is it too late? Perhaps it is, because in the article “CPF is not a Pension Fund” the NZ Chief Executive also targets Singaporeans who are entitled to NZ pensions. Australia is a more fair country as they do not target Singaporeans’ CPF savings.
MONKEY SEE, MONKEY DO.

Rating: +15 (from 15 votes)

 

July 3, 2015 at 5:59 pm  (Quote)

Is there any country where the peoples’ personal CPF life-savings are stolen from under their noses and they keep quiet about it, get sued if they ask about it, and still vote for these thieves? Then when you need money for your medical bills and sell your flat, you get nothing in your hand except a CPF statement, look at it and feel rich but remain hungry and sick and go around collecting tin cans and cardboard boxes?

A thief comes into your house and takes your savings – then he has the audacity to come back tomorrow and say you have to pay him for insurance that will “help” you pay your future medical bills.

A boy speaks the truth about what is really happening and is locked up, assaulted in front of the subordinate courts and locked up again, shackled to a bed, pissing into a bottle, then kept in a hard-core mental institution, abused by crazy “in-mates” screaming at him 24/7 in a tiny cell with lights switched on 24/7.

Is there any hope left?

Rating: +84 (from 84 votes)

 

Why CPF will always remain an issue

July 14, 2015 at 9:05 pm  (Quote)

Any Party in the coming ERECTIONs will WIN just on the issue of CPF. There are no people (except Singaporeans), no race or colour that will accept a government that will not return your money saved over a life-time of blood, sweat and tears. Even Malaysia does not dare to do what the PAP has done for 5 decades. American Presidents have been disposed off for not even doing a miniscule portion of the WRONGS done over this 50 years – CPF, HDB, DBSS, BTO, COE, Minimum Sum, Medisave, CPF Life, etc., a list too long to detail.

There is a saying, “You deserve the partner you choose”, so be aware and discerning, as 5o years of immorality is nothing to celebrate about this national day.

A nation of oppressed and betrayed citizens, held to ransom by the thieves they voted in again and again. I DON’T KNOW WHAT TO SAY.

Rating: +18 (from 18 votes)

 

International Scholarship Programme – Perfect Example of Discrimination Against Singaporeans

July 22, 2015 at 7:35 pm  (Quote)

The greatest DISCRIMINATION is not returning our CPF at 55 while returning the CPF SAVINGS in FULL of non-citizens.
Discrimination against Amos Yee as against the Filipino who threatened Singaporeans who has not had any action taken by the SPF.
Discrimination against Singaporeans by the old white bully on the MRT as no action taken against him.
DISCRIMINATORY JUSTICE.

Rating: +18 (from 18 votes)

 

 

CPF’s global pensions ‘B’ rating is wrong

http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/07/20/cpfs-global-pensions-rating-of-b-is-wrong/

July 20, 2015 at 7:38 pm  (Quote)

Ang Moh Kow are dafts. A pension is state-funded. CPF is a savings fund forced upon Singapore citizens whose hard-earned SAVINGS have been kidnapped. How can these idiots lump the CPF with all the countries that provide state pensions? Even in China (rated D), old people get a small pension. Even in Vietnam (not even in the list, so therefore rated E), old people get state-funded pensions.
Singapore gives pensions? You must be joking!
Your own savings suddenly becomes a pension?
If China is rated D and Vietnam rated E, then Singapore must be rated F – F for F..K.

 

Govt’s greatest Conflict of Interest

July 20, 2015 at 7:53 pm  (Quote)

“I understand that no Government in the world does not return such a huge proportion of the national pension fund returns to the people.”

The CPF is not a national PENSION fund. It is a national SAVINGS fund. There are no people in this world who will allow a small group of politicians to defer the refund of their life-time SAVINGS from 55 to 65 and then to monthly refund installments insufficient to rent a 2-room HDB flat.

This conflict of interest in every arena has been rampant for 50 years.

 

Analaysis of new boundary map drawn by Electoral Boundaries Review Committee

July 25, 2015 at 7:18 am  (Quote)

 

Do you want your CPF to be rightly returned to you as per the original contract, at 55 years old?

Then do not vote for the traitors who have betrayed you for the last 50 years with numerous wrongs – these cockroaches do not know what is RIGHT or WRONG and Singaporeans have lived in fear for too long.

Do you want a JUSTICE system that will be independent and not fix you up any which way they can, obeying these self-proclaimed aristocrats? All aristocrats were guillotined many years ago in the French Revolution.

Self-serving ilLEEgally rewarded politicians have no place in Singapore’s future.