Read all about how the Court of Appeal prevents Singaporeans from appealing the unfair decision of a High Court judge, that the CPF savings of Singaporeans belong to the NZ Ministry of Social Development (i.e. taxed 100%) while the CPF savings of their ex-Premier, SIR John Key and thousands of Kiwis who worked in Singapore and collected their CPF money are tax-free and belong only to them. If this is not DISCRIMINATION, what do you call it? Singaporeans are lesser beings than their own people?
Criminals have the right of appeal to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, but Singaporeans have to ask permission to appeal the unfair decision of a High Court judge by applying for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal, and denied the right to appeal.
Singaporeans discriminated by the New Zealand Ministry of Social Development
THE NZ HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION TURNS A BLIND EYE ON THESE CASES AND ENGINEERED PROLONGED DELAYS TO STONEWALL WHAT IS A SIMPLE ISSUE OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST ONE NATIONALITY BECAUSE NO OTHER NATIONALITY IS AFFECTED BY THE NZ GOVT’S CORRUPT INTERPRETATION THAT THE CPF IS A BENEFIT, PENSION AND PERIODIC ALLOWANCE FOR SINGAPOREANS ONLY [BUT OTHER NATIONALITIES ARE FREE TO COLLECT THEIR TAX-FREE CPF SAVINGS FROM THE SINGAPORE CPF BOARD.]
John Key collected his CPF tax-free savings,
Kiwi son collected his CPF tax-free savings,
Malaysian Ah Kow collected his CPF tax-free savings,
Ex-Singaporean Allen Lee collected his CPF tax-free savings,
BUT, Mr Singapore has his CPF savings TAXED 100% by the conniving weasel of a Chief Executive who ruled that the monthly refund of one’s own CPF savings, “can be seen as a periodic allowance”.
Your own savings suddenly becomes an “allowance”, just because you did not throw away your Singapore passport? Has any other country in the world indirectly forced another citizen to discard your citizenship or you will be taxed 100%?